© 2024 Louisville Public Media

Public Files:
89.3 WFPL · 90.5 WUOL-FM · 91.9 WFPK

For assistance accessing our public files, please contact info@lpm.org or call 502-814-6500
89.3 WFPL News | 90.5 WUOL Classical 91.9 WFPK Music | KyCIR Investigations
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
Stream: News Music Classical

Indiana Senate bill criminalizes electronic tracking, with some exceptions

Indiana state Senator Mike Crider speaks to fellow lawmakers at a podium.
Lauren Chapman
IPB News
Sen. Mike Crider, a Republican from Greenfield, began working on a bill to criminalize electronic tracking after a constituent was assaulted after being tracked with GPS technology.

The bill arose from an incident last year in which a woman was viciously assaulted by her ex-boyfriend, who used GPS technology to track her.

It would be a felony to electronically track someone in many cases under legislation unanimously approved by the Indiana Senate Tuesday.

The bill arose from an incident last year in which a woman was viciously assaulted by her ex-boyfriend after he tracked her using GPS technology.

That incident happened in Sen. Mike Crider’s, a Republican from Greenfield, district. His bill, SB 161, allows a judge to ban the use of tracking devices as part of a protective order. And it makes tracking someone electronically a felony, with some exceptions.

“So, we’re trying to do what we can to protect those people that have sought out protective orders and make sure that that order does, in fact, provide that layer of protection that they’re seeking,” Crider said.

Join the conversation and sign up for the Indiana Two-Way. Text "Indiana" to 73224. Your comments and questions in response to our weekly text help us find the answers you need on statewide issues throughout the legislative session. And follow along with our bill tracker.

Sen. Liz Brown, a Republican from Fort Wayne, has an issue with one of the bill’s exceptions. Under the measure, family members can still legally track each other, unless they’re under a protective order.

“If a husband and wife are still able, without consent, to track each other and maybe they have a slightly acrimonious marriage – and they’re moving into divorce, but not yet – then that’s covered under this,” Brown said.

But Sen. Aaron Freeman, a Republican from Indianapolis, said he thinks that exception is important.

"I can see countless examples of why parents want to track their kids," Freeman said. "I can see why parents would want to track their adult kids. I can see why children are going to want to track their then-elderly parents."

Other exceptions include putting a tracking device on one's own property, tracking someone who's incarcerated or part of parole, home detention or community corrections and a tracking device installed by a manufacturer in a motor vehicle.

The measure now heads to the House.

Brandon is our Statehouse bureau chief. Contact him at bsmith@ipbs.org or follow him on Twitter at @brandonjsmith5.
Copyright 2023 IPB News.

Brandon Smith

Can we count on your support?

Louisville Public Media depends on donations from members – generous people like you – for the majority of our funding. You can help make the next story possible with a donation of $10 or $20. We'll put your gift to work providing news and music for our diverse community.